I don't think we will ever learn the truth about JFK assignation. All the speculation and "theories" just add fuel to the fire. The Deep State loves it, it keeps us all guessing and debating each other. Divide and conquer, it's how we live our lives today!
I used to turn on Fox news now and again when Tucker was on, because he would occasionally interview people with information and viewpoints that ran counter to the mainstream narrative on a host of subjects, like JFK, UFOs, vaccines, Big Pharma, wars, etc. In my opinion, everybody else on Fox was so predictable in their messages that after a while they all sounded like parrots, just like the personalities on CNN and MSNBC. Given the fact that Tucker's youtube show is beating all the other news shows indicates that I was not the only one interested in the material that Tucker was presenting. He appears to me to have sincerely considered the raw data on these topics and decided to tell the truth, just like whistleblowers. Although somewhat rare, these people do exist who have a high level of integrity and cannot be fooled or bought or scared off, despite knowing they are placing themselves in danger.
I still miss Tucker's Fox show, Kev. But even the Jesse Waters' types were treating the subject differently than they used to. The right-wing, outside of Ben Shapiro and some other shills, seems to openly accept there was a conspiracy. Thanks.
The other side of the coin here is those who claim the assassination didn't happen at all. Which is just hilarious because in the two cases -- one being our good friend, MM; the second a Substacker who goes by "Proton Magic" -- these "researchers" fail to consider the primary evidence, namely, the Zapruder film. I never imagined I would have to explain to someone that the Zapruder film is THE definitive proof of the assassination. Moreover, it's in the best form possible: a video recording, complete with kill shot! So we have documented visual evidence of the assassination, yet both of the aforementioned fail -- or perhaps "refuse" is the better word -- to consider the primary evidence. I continue to be baffled by this. My response to anyone who claims the event didn't happen: prove that the Zapruder film is fake and I'm all ears and eyes. I'd be elated to be shown that the event didn't actually happen. But until you do that, you can't ever say the assassination was fake. It begins and ends with the Zapruder film.
Specifically, in PM's case, I pointed out his failure/refusal to debunk the Zapruder film and he more or less dismissed the film (of all things to dismiss) as not relevant because it's Jackie's supposed anomalous behavior AFTER the fatal shot that, in his mind, reveals the event was fake. When I pointed out that someone's behavior AFTER the event is irrelevant to the main evidence of the EVENT ITSELF (again, historically documented via video recording), he then proceeded to engage in one logical fallacy after another in claiming the assassination was fake because Jackie...wait for it...was "acting":
MM, of course, has never addressed the Zapruder film (his latest: https://mileswmathis.com/jfk3.pdf), which is odd because Miles claims to be the great detector of photo paste-ups. So let's hear it then, MM, on the fake that is the Zapruder film. Just like PM, however, it's everything ELSE that "proves" the event didn't happen.
You're right, Rob. A shocking number of people- including some regular listeners of my podcast- believe the assassination was fake. Now, the Zapruder film is questionable, in that it has almost certainly been altered to at least some degree. And the absence of any professional footage of the motorcade is suspicious. I've told people that if the JFK assassination was fake, then my 50 years of research has been meaningless. I wasted a lifetime on a fraud. Yes, I think lots of things are dubious, and sometimes I feel like we're living in a giant Truman Show. But if everything is fake, what is reality? Thanks.
I've wondered also why there's no professional footage from Dealey Plaza. Dallas had TV stations. One possibility is the logistical challenge of covering the motorcade live.
I think the explanation is actually rather simple. TV stations were "told" to stay away from Dealey Plaza, perhaps even denied physical access by the feds asserting their usual authority. The reason? If you have multiple cameras covering the scene, the direction of the fatal shot is much easier to identify (for us independent and intrepid researchers).
Instead, restrict footage to that from a single "bystander" and you have: 1) proof that the murder actually took place (necessary back in 1963 when "fake" deaths weren't yet the thing?), and 2) the initiation of years of infinite and altogether tiresome speculation about where the shots came from. Thus, a forever "unsolvable" crime, a great mystery for the unwashed masses to perpetually discuss and debate. The PTB, as is their wont, can then just sit back (laugh) and watch us all get legitimately worked up over who/what/where, etc.
The fact of only a single video recording also makes it easier for the PTB to do the necessary doctoring. They just have to alter (slightly) the one set of footage. Specifically, take out those frames that show the limo was brought to a halt prior to the fatal shot. Then, add a white spot to cover the head wound (very CGI savvy for 1963 :), which would otherwise clearly reveal that the shot came from the front.
Multiple sets of footage makes all of that much more difficult.
? Did you read my previous comment? (see "The other side of the coin..." above). I'm saying the EXACT opposite. But prevent people from ever determining the truth about where the fatal shot came from.
I will say I find it difficult to believe the Zapruder film hasn't been tampered with. I also am a little suspicious that Zapruder just happened to be in the right place at the right time with his camera rolling.
Having lived in Dallas-Fort Worth for a number of years, I was struck by how the three murders, Kennedy, Tippit and Oswald, happened in close proximity in time and location.
All three killings involved breaks in patterns. The Secret Service failed to protect the president, Tippit was out of his regular patrol zone and the police failed to protect Oswald.
I also read that Dan Rather, after seeing the Zapruder film before it was aired publicly when on record that the head pushed forward when the fatal (front) shot was fired . In spite of all types of autopsy and video evidence, he stuck to that line.
I don't think we will ever learn the truth about JFK assignation. All the speculation and "theories" just add fuel to the fire. The Deep State loves it, it keeps us all guessing and debating each other. Divide and conquer, it's how we live our lives today!
You're right, Robin. That's why I always focus on telling people whoever killed JFK, it wasn't Oswald. And they are still lying to us. Thanks!
I used to turn on Fox news now and again when Tucker was on, because he would occasionally interview people with information and viewpoints that ran counter to the mainstream narrative on a host of subjects, like JFK, UFOs, vaccines, Big Pharma, wars, etc. In my opinion, everybody else on Fox was so predictable in their messages that after a while they all sounded like parrots, just like the personalities on CNN and MSNBC. Given the fact that Tucker's youtube show is beating all the other news shows indicates that I was not the only one interested in the material that Tucker was presenting. He appears to me to have sincerely considered the raw data on these topics and decided to tell the truth, just like whistleblowers. Although somewhat rare, these people do exist who have a high level of integrity and cannot be fooled or bought or scared off, despite knowing they are placing themselves in danger.
I still miss Tucker's Fox show, Kev. But even the Jesse Waters' types were treating the subject differently than they used to. The right-wing, outside of Ben Shapiro and some other shills, seems to openly accept there was a conspiracy. Thanks.
If my theory is right, the government will never tell the truth about Dallas.
Ah, yes, the "research community."
The other side of the coin here is those who claim the assassination didn't happen at all. Which is just hilarious because in the two cases -- one being our good friend, MM; the second a Substacker who goes by "Proton Magic" -- these "researchers" fail to consider the primary evidence, namely, the Zapruder film. I never imagined I would have to explain to someone that the Zapruder film is THE definitive proof of the assassination. Moreover, it's in the best form possible: a video recording, complete with kill shot! So we have documented visual evidence of the assassination, yet both of the aforementioned fail -- or perhaps "refuse" is the better word -- to consider the primary evidence. I continue to be baffled by this. My response to anyone who claims the event didn't happen: prove that the Zapruder film is fake and I'm all ears and eyes. I'd be elated to be shown that the event didn't actually happen. But until you do that, you can't ever say the assassination was fake. It begins and ends with the Zapruder film.
Specifically, in PM's case, I pointed out his failure/refusal to debunk the Zapruder film and he more or less dismissed the film (of all things to dismiss) as not relevant because it's Jackie's supposed anomalous behavior AFTER the fatal shot that, in his mind, reveals the event was fake. When I pointed out that someone's behavior AFTER the event is irrelevant to the main evidence of the EVENT ITSELF (again, historically documented via video recording), he then proceeded to engage in one logical fallacy after another in claiming the assassination was fake because Jackie...wait for it...was "acting":
https://protonmagic.substack.com/p/jackie-the-car-jumper/comment/40752546)
MM, of course, has never addressed the Zapruder film (his latest: https://mileswmathis.com/jfk3.pdf), which is odd because Miles claims to be the great detector of photo paste-ups. So let's hear it then, MM, on the fake that is the Zapruder film. Just like PM, however, it's everything ELSE that "proves" the event didn't happen.
You're right, Rob. A shocking number of people- including some regular listeners of my podcast- believe the assassination was fake. Now, the Zapruder film is questionable, in that it has almost certainly been altered to at least some degree. And the absence of any professional footage of the motorcade is suspicious. I've told people that if the JFK assassination was fake, then my 50 years of research has been meaningless. I wasted a lifetime on a fraud. Yes, I think lots of things are dubious, and sometimes I feel like we're living in a giant Truman Show. But if everything is fake, what is reality? Thanks.
I've wondered also why there's no professional footage from Dealey Plaza. Dallas had TV stations. One possibility is the logistical challenge of covering the motorcade live.
I think the explanation is actually rather simple. TV stations were "told" to stay away from Dealey Plaza, perhaps even denied physical access by the feds asserting their usual authority. The reason? If you have multiple cameras covering the scene, the direction of the fatal shot is much easier to identify (for us independent and intrepid researchers).
Instead, restrict footage to that from a single "bystander" and you have: 1) proof that the murder actually took place (necessary back in 1963 when "fake" deaths weren't yet the thing?), and 2) the initiation of years of infinite and altogether tiresome speculation about where the shots came from. Thus, a forever "unsolvable" crime, a great mystery for the unwashed masses to perpetually discuss and debate. The PTB, as is their wont, can then just sit back (laugh) and watch us all get legitimately worked up over who/what/where, etc.
The fact of only a single video recording also makes it easier for the PTB to do the necessary doctoring. They just have to alter (slightly) the one set of footage. Specifically, take out those frames that show the limo was brought to a halt prior to the fatal shot. Then, add a white spot to cover the head wound (very CGI savvy for 1963 :), which would otherwise clearly reveal that the shot came from the front.
Multiple sets of footage makes all of that much more difficult.
I think you're right, Rob. But very few researchers, other than me, have consistently questioned this. Thanks.
So are you saying the assassination didn't really happen?
That strikes me as highly implausible.
? Did you read my previous comment? (see "The other side of the coin..." above). I'm saying the EXACT opposite. But prevent people from ever determining the truth about where the fatal shot came from.
Okay.
I will say I find it difficult to believe the Zapruder film hasn't been tampered with. I also am a little suspicious that Zapruder just happened to be in the right place at the right time with his camera rolling.
Having lived in Dallas-Fort Worth for a number of years, I was struck by how the three murders, Kennedy, Tippit and Oswald, happened in close proximity in time and location.
All three killings involved breaks in patterns. The Secret Service failed to protect the president, Tippit was out of his regular patrol zone and the police failed to protect Oswald.
SOMEBODY was definitely shot at Dealy Plaza that fateful November Day. Whether it was JFK is up for debate.
I just turned 3 when the conspiracy started.
And you probably already knew Oswald didn't do it, Mike. Thanks.
I also read that Dan Rather, after seeing the Zapruder film before it was aired publicly when on record that the head pushed forward when the fatal (front) shot was fired . In spite of all types of autopsy and video evidence, he stuck to that line.
Yes he did, Walter. And that launched his national career. He has continued to lie about the subject for more than 60 years. Thanks!